Ushi No Tane Forum

Kemine wrote:Do you mean Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess...?

Uhm....not really. And yes, I've played and beaten TP. Twice.

LoZ (any LoZ) has dungeons and whatnot, but you can't really leave and expect to come back and beat it, they're those kinds where you go in and beat it at once or else the traps reset.

RF has dungeons and whatnot, but you can leave. Sure, monsters respawn, but that's not a big deal. You need to grow plants in the dungeons, not avoid traps.

LoZ has a ton of puzzles (you know, the traps) whereas RF does not.

Yes, they both have fighting. Yes, they both have adventure, kind of, but then, so do many other games. Assassin's Creed had adventure and fighting. FF has adventure and fighting (even more so than both those games, in FF you don't often revisit places whereas in TP and RF you do. Many times).

And in RF you also need to befriend people. In TP, whoopdedo if you befriend them, it's not as intense as RF.

Besides, to compare HM and LoZ is, imo, a little strange and silly. Don't get me wrong, I love both series, a lot, but they're on two different levels. To start, TP is amazing and on the Wii/GCube. RF is on DS. DS is already not as good as the stationary platforms simply because it is unable to handle that kind of stuff. The Wii/GCube are able to handle so much more than DS. Better graphics, better gameplay, just because it is that. That's why it confuses me when people try to compare "stationary" games to "portable" games, especially when they're different series entirely. They're not always comparable.

And this doesn't mean RF is bad. Not at all. You'll still enjoy it I'm sure, but don't be disappointed when it doesn't meet Twilight Princess standards.

Distorted_Rainbow wrote:Sounds like you got a plan. It'll also give you plenty of time to max out everyone's friendship/love points. You get the woolys pretty early on in the game if I remember correctly.