Page 1 of 1

Anticipated review

Posted: Sep 30, 2009 12:32 pm
by Guest
IGN gave the previous title a 5.8!
http://ds.ign.com/articles/907/907265p1.html
I haven't played any handheld HM games since FOMT. I was looking forward to this game but is it worth it if IGN gave it's previous title a mediocre score? I think I will wait for Rune Factory 3 instead now. ^_^

Thank you very much,

Re: Anticipated review

Posted: Sep 30, 2009 12:37 pm
by Einherjar
Soo... what was your question again? I mean, you just asked if it was worth it, but then you said, that you're not going to bother with it, so what's the point? ._.

Re: Anticipated review

Posted: Sep 30, 2009 12:54 pm
by Soapylion
Sunshine Islands is an improvement on IoH. There are more things you can do, a new bachelor, a new bachelorette, new controls, more events... Just an improvement overall. And you shouldn't pay that much attention to IGN's scores. Whether you like the game or not is a matter of opinion really, and people normally criticise Harvest Moon as being repetitive and boring. I don't think it's that at all.

It's against the rules to tell you whether to buy it or not because it's entirely your choice. If you enjoyed FoMT, chances are you'll enjoy this as well. :D

Re: Anticipated review

Posted: Sep 30, 2009 4:12 pm
by Guest
Soapylion
Thank you for your quick and helpful response!
I really really liked FOMT! (So much so that it has formed a calander of my life... >.> Yes I am addicted)

I will try the game out! ^_^

Einherjar, (why is everyone's name so hard to spell? :P)
I'm sorry I confused you, but I have my anser now so this thread is ready to be closed.
Thank you for your comment.

Re: Anticipated review

Posted: Sep 30, 2009 5:48 pm
by Blaze367
Wow, only a 5.8... well sunshine should be an improvement. A big one

Re: Anticipated review

Posted: Sep 30, 2009 5:54 pm
by Cherubae
That old review for IoH was done by someone who clearly did not want to write it, and prefers the Rune Factory series.

Please do not compare Sunshine Islands to IoH. People reading your topic may assume that the review is for SI and not for IoH.